OFT Debt Management Guidelines |
Skill and fairness.
10) The purpose of this guidance is to set out minimum standards to be
met by DMCs if they are to be judged fit to hold a consumer credit
licence. The guidance does not, however, set out a comprehensive
checklist. Not all of its elements will apply to every DMC, it is not
exhaustive and conduct or omissions not included in the guidance may be
taken into account by the OFT in determining fitness. DMCs are expected
to abide by the spirit as well as the letter of the Guidance.
11) Some of the practices highlighted here are clearly unfair or
improper and in those cases DMCs should have been aware even before the
issue of this Guidance of the risk of licensing action if they engaged
in such practices or allowed their employees, agents or associates to do
so. In other cases the position might have been less clear, and this
Guidance is intended to be helpfulin outlining the kinds of business
practice to which the OFT is likely to object.
DMC acting as an agent for a consumer debtor
12) During the consultation on this guidance the OFT has been told that
some creditors have a blanket policy of refusing to enter into
negotiations with some DMCs or even refusing to accept payments sent by
DMCs on behalf of consumers. The OFT is concerned at these reports,
especially those suggesting payments are refused.
13) Where a consumer appoints a representative to negotiate on their
behalf, it is an unfair and improper business practice on the part of
the creditor to operate a policy, without reason, of refusing to
consider such requests.
14) Where a creditor wishes to refuse to negotiate with a particular
representative, it must make its position known to the representative
and also immediately inform any consumer on whose behalf the creditor is
approached by that representative.
15) Where payments are tendered not by the debtor personally but by
someone acting on his/her behalf, it is a principle of law that
creditors cannot refuse to accept those payments. The practice of
creditors returning payments, or not crediting payments to consumers’
accounts, purely because they are received through a DMC, therefore, is
not acceptable and is a matter which the Office regards as seriously
detrimental to the fitness of the creditor. This is so even in
circumstances where a creditor has indicated that it will not negotiate
with a DMC acting as a representative of a debtor.
16) It has also emerged in the consultation that some lenders and credit
brokers refer consumers to DMCs as potential clients. There is no
objection to this provided it is done with the informed, prior consent
of the consumer. Referrals made without this consent will affect the
fitness of the lender or credit broker.
<<Back More>>
|